Skip to content

OCPBUGS-85518: Remove TP note for NUMA scheduler HA - #118617

Open
kquinn1204 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:enterprise-4.21from
kquinn1204:OCPBUGS-85518-enterprise-4.21
Open

OCPBUGS-85518: Remove TP note for NUMA scheduler HA#118617
kquinn1204 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:enterprise-4.21from
kquinn1204:OCPBUGS-85518-enterprise-4.21

Conversation

@kquinn1204

@kquinn1204 kquinn1204 commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Remove the Technology Preview note from the Managing high availability (HA) for the NUMA-aware scheduler section.

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@kquinn1204 @claude
OCPBUGS-85518: Remove TP note for NUMA scheduler HA
b53b3fa 
Remove the Technology Preview note from the Managing high
availability (HA) for the NUMA-aware scheduler section.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 21, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kquinn1204: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85518, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85518 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Remove the Technology Preview note from the Managing high availability (HA) for the NUMA-aware scheduler section.

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 21, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Fri Aug 21 12:40:52 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://118617--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/cnf-numa-aware-scheduling.html

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kquinn1204: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kquinn1204 @openshift-ci-robot @ocpdocs-previewbot